BPJS Watch Criticizes Selection Process for 2026-2031 Board Members, Calls for Transparency
Back
Back
4
Impact
6
Urgency
Sentiment Analysis
BearishNegativeBullish
PublishedDec 4
Sources1 verified

BPJS Watch Criticizes Selection Process for 2026-2031 Board Members, Calls for Transparency

AnalisaHub Editorial·December 4, 2025
Executive Summary
01

Executive Summary

Key insights and market outlook

BPJS Watch has criticized the selection process for BPJS Kesehatan and BPJS Ketenagakerjaan board members for 2026-2031, citing lack of transparency and systematic approach. The criticism focuses on late formation of selection committee, rushed registration period, and subjective administrative selection. BPJS Watch demands greater transparency in the selection process, including publication of candidate answers to support objective assessment.

Full Analysis
02

Deep Dive Analysis

BPJS Watch Criticizes Selection Process for BPJS Board Members

Concerns Over Transparency and Systematic Approach

BPJS Watch has raised significant concerns about the selection process for the Board of Supervisors and Directors of BPJS Kesehatan and BPJS Ketenagakerjaan for the 2026-2031 period. The criticism centers on the lack of transparency and systematic methodology in the selection process.

Key Issues Highlighted

  1. Late Formation of Selection Committee: The selection committee was formed on October 2, 2025, which BPJS Watch considers too late as it should have been established by August 2025, six months before the current board's term ends in February 2025.
  2. Rushed Registration Period: The registration for candidates was open for only three days (October 14-16, 2025), which was deemed insufficient and led to many competent candidates being eliminated on administrative grounds without clear explanations.
  3. Subjective Administrative Selection: The administrative selection process was criticized for being non-transparent and subjective, with many candidates being disqualified without proper justification.
  4. Manual Assessment of Competency Tests: BPJS Watch also questioned the manual evaluation of competency tests, which included multiple-choice questions and essays, highlighting the potential for errors and bias in the assessment.

Call for Greater Transparency

To address these concerns, BPJS Watch is calling for greater transparency in the selection process. This includes publishing the answers provided by candidates during the competency tests to allow for public scrutiny and ensure objectivity. The organization emphasizes the need to avoid political influences in the selection process and to prioritize the candidates' competence and ability.

Implications for Future Selections

The criticisms raised by BPJS Watch highlight the importance of improving the selection process for future appointments. Ensuring transparency, objectivity, and competence in the selection of board members is crucial for the effective governance of BPJS Kesehatan and BPJS Ketenagakerjaan.

Original Sources
03

Source References

Click any source to view the original article in a new tab

Story Info

Published
1 month ago
Read Time
11 min
Sources
1 verified

Topics Covered

BPJSTransparency in GovernanceSelection Process Criticism

Key Events

1

BPJS Board Selection Process Criticized

2

Call for Transparency in BPJS Governance

Timeline from 1 verified sources