Key insights and market outlook
BPJS Watch has criticized the selection process for BPJS Kesehatan and BPJS Ketenagakerjaan board members for 2026-2031, citing lack of transparency and systematic approach. The criticism focuses on late formation of selection committee, rushed registration period, and subjective administrative selection. BPJS Watch demands greater transparency in the selection process, including publication of candidate answers to support objective assessment.
BPJS Watch has raised significant concerns about the selection process for the Board of Supervisors and Directors of BPJS Kesehatan and BPJS Ketenagakerjaan for the 2026-2031 period. The criticism centers on the lack of transparency and systematic methodology in the selection process.
To address these concerns, BPJS Watch is calling for greater transparency in the selection process. This includes publishing the answers provided by candidates during the competency tests to allow for public scrutiny and ensure objectivity. The organization emphasizes the need to avoid political influences in the selection process and to prioritize the candidates' competence and ability.
The criticisms raised by BPJS Watch highlight the importance of improving the selection process for future appointments. Ensuring transparency, objectivity, and competence in the selection of board members is crucial for the effective governance of BPJS Kesehatan and BPJS Ketenagakerjaan.
BPJS Board Selection Process Criticized
Call for Transparency in BPJS Governance