Indonesian Ride-hailing Drivers Protest Against New Insurance Regulations and Fare Hikes
Back
Back
4
Impact
6
Urgency
Sentiment Analysis
BearishNegativeBullish
PublishedJan 5
Sources2 verified

Indonesian Ride-hailing Drivers Protest Against New Insurance Regulations and Fare Hikes

AnalisaHub Editorial·January 5, 2026
Executive Summary
01

Executive Summary

Key insights and market outlook

Indonesian ride-hailing drivers are protesting against new regulations introduced by the government, specifically the PP 20/2025 regarding JKK-JKM insurance contributions that they deem burdensome. Additionally, they are demanding a 90:10 revenue sharing ratio between drivers and platform companies before agreeing to any fare increases. The drivers argue that without proper regulations on revenue sharing, fare hikes will only benefit the companies while their financial burdens continue to grow.

Full Analysis
02

Deep Dive Analysis

Indonesian Ride-hailing Drivers Demand Regulatory Reforms and Fair Revenue Sharing

Protests Against New Insurance Regulations

The Indonesian Transportation Workers Union (SPAI) is urging the government to revise PP 20/2025, which regulates JKK-JKM insurance contributions for ride-hailing drivers. The union argues that this regulation further weakens the position of online transportation drivers, including ojol, taksol, and couriers, amid already declining incomes 1

.

Key Demands: Fair Revenue Sharing and Regulatory Reform

The Garda Indonesia association, representing ojol drivers, has rejected any fare increases until the government issues a Presidential Regulation (Perpres) on revenue sharing. They demand a 90:10 revenue split, favoring drivers as the primary workers, while companies would receive the remaining 10% 2

.

Rationale Behind the Demands

Drivers argue that their work arrangement with platform companies fulfills the three elements of an employment relationship as defined by Law No. 13/2003 on Labor: work, wages, and command. They claim that platform companies control their work through strict application rules, determine their earnings through unilateral tariff schemes, and enforce compliance through penalty systems 1

.

Implications of Current Regulations

The new insurance regulations categorize ride-hailing drivers as Non-Wage Recipients (BPU), which the union believes is a step backward in labor protection. This classification, combined with the increased financial burden of JKK-JKM contributions, has sparked widespread discontent among drivers.

Path Forward: Regulatory Adjustments

To address these issues, the government is being urged to revise PP 20/2025 and establish clear guidelines on revenue sharing between drivers and platform companies. Without these changes, drivers fear that fare increases will not translate into better financial outcomes for them.

Original Sources

Story Info

Published
1 week ago
Read Time
12 min
Sources
2 verified

Topics Covered

Labor RegulationsRide-hailing IndustryRevenue Sharing

Key Events

1

Protests Against New Insurance Regulations

2

Demand for 90:10 Revenue Sharing Ratio

Timeline from 2 verified sources